The Physics Of The Sport Of Football - 1335 Words

Every year millions of spectators marvel over the physical beauty, that is the sport of football. While the game of football provides entertainment for millions of viewers each year, most people do not realize that the most basic principles of science enable the sport to function properly. Behind every play there is a scientific with an explanation as to why something is happening. It is the physics of football that make it such an enjoyable experience for spectators. The physicality behind one of America’s earliest pastimes can be explained by some of science’s earliest principles, Isaac Newton’s Three Laws of Motion. Newton was one of the most influential scientists of all time. His ideas became the basis for modern physics. Separately,†¦show more content†¦While one team is on offense, there is an opposite team that is trying to prevent them from positively gaining yards or even scoring. Often times the offensive team runs multiple plays and a tackle is made by the opposing defense. During a live play the defense will try to stop the opposing player with the ball, regardless of the position of the offensive player. â€Å"It is the duty of the offensive player to run as far and as fast as they possibly can in order to achieve success. Their natural resistance to the outside force stopping them is called inertia. Since the offensive ball carrier is in motion and doesn’t want to be stopped it will take an external force from the defensive player to try and stop them. The inertia of each individual player is proportional to their mass, meaning the player trying to be stopped will be harder to move off their path of movement (â€Å"Science of NFL Football: Newton s First Law of Motion,† n.d.)†. Just like the first law of inertia, Newton’s second law can also be easily applied to the game too. â€Å"The second law of motion states, â€Å"The acceleration produced by a particular force acting on a body is directly proportional to the magnitude of the force and inversely proportional to the mass of the body.† When a constant force acts on a massive body, it causes it to accelerate and to change its velocity, at a constant rate. In the simplest case, a force applied to an object at rest causes it to accelerate in the direction of the

Spanish And English Language Development - 966 Words

Angela Cisneros Linguistics 1 Professor Schuh 14 March 2015 Term Paper (Introduction) I grew up in a Hispanic household and was taught Spanish at a very young age. I spoke only Spanish until I began kindergarten. My school only permitted English, thus I was placed in an English Language Development course that helped me learn English. My parents spoke English and Spanish, so I was able to practice my English with them as well. I was in the E.L.D course from first to fourth grade. Slowly but surely I was able to communicate effectively, I still struggle with the English grammar. Due to the drastic change from Spanish to English, my ability to speak Spanish began to deteriorate and slowly began to turn into Spanglish. The only time†¦show more content†¦For example, â€Å"school† becomes eschool or â€Å"shape† becomes esshape. Whereas, English native speakers who learn Spanish at a later age struggle with understanding that some letters are not pronounced in particular words. For example, hombre which means man, is pronounced as â€Å"ohmbre†, and the letter J actually sounds like the H in the spanish alphabet for instance, san juan. I feel though that the English language is a much more difficult language compared to Spanish because it has so many rules that one needs to follow. For instance, Spanish just has those 5 vowels if you learn them and learn how to pronounce them you are set. (Comparison of Grammar) I will be comparing the gender agreement in Spanish and English. In Spanish all nouns are either feminine or masculine (La y El ) and the adjectives have to agree with the noun that is being described. So if the noun is masculine, the adjective must be masculine and if the same noun is as well plural, the adjective will be masculine and plural. For instance, â€Å"El libro†-masculine and plural, whereas â€Å"Los libros† is all parts masculine and plural as well. Looking at the English language one can see that it

Arithmetic Q Free Essays

Question 1: Consider the following graph G. [pic] 1. Give the adjacency matrix and adjacency list of the graph G. We will write a custom essay sample on Arithmetic Q or any similar topic only for you Order Now (5 marks) adjacency matrix: [pic] adjacency list: |a | | b | |c | | d | |e | |f | b d a c e b e f a e b c d f c e 2. Give the incidence matrix and incidence list of the graph G. (5 marks) [pic] incidence matrix [pic] incidence list |1 | | 2 | |3 | | 4 | |5 | |6 | a b a d b c b e c e c e |7 | 8 | d e e f Question 2: Consider the graph I. Starting at the vertex a and resolving ties by the vertex alphabetical order traverse the graph by breadth-first-search (BFS) and construct the corresponding BFS tree. (5 marks) [pic] The order is : a b e g f c d h II. Starting at the vertex a and resolving ties by the vertex alphabetical order traverse the graph by depth-first-search (DFS) and construct the corresponding BFS tree. (5 marks) [pic] The order is : a b f e g c d h Question 3: Consider the following graph G. The label of an edge is the cost of the edge. 1. Using Prim’s algorithm, draw a minimum spanning tree (MST) of the graph Also write down the change of the priority queue step by step and the order in which the vertices are selected. Is the MST drawn unique? (i. e. , is it the one and only MST for the graph? ) [7 marks] Not unique [pic] 2. Using Kruskal’s algorithm, draw a minimum spanning tree (MST) of the graph G. Write down the order in which the edges are selected. Is the MST drawn unique? (i. e. , is it the one and only MST for the graph? ) (5 marks) Not unique [pic] 3. Referring to the same graph above, find the shortest paths from the vertex a to all other vertices in the graph G using Dijkstra’s algorithm. Show the changes of the priority queue step by step and give the order in which edges are selected. (8 marks) [pic] Order in which edges are selected: a-e, e-f, a-b, f-g, b-c, g-h, c-d the shortest paths from the vertex a to all other vertices: a. b: 4 a. c: 10 a. d:17 a. e:1 a. f:3 a. g:8 a. h: 16 N. B. There may be more than one solution. You only need to give one of the solutions. How to cite Arithmetic Q, Papers

Ansons Law of Contract

Question: Describe about the Ansons Law of Contract? Answer: The law of agency also includes lingering authority or apparent authority. According to it, if the principal fails to inform the parties involved in the transaction of the termination of the agency and the parties act in the belief that the agency is still in effect, or the parties have enough reason to believe that the agency has in fact not been terminated, then, the principle will be held liable for the acts done by the agent. (Freeman and Lockyer v Buckhurst Park Properties (Mangal) Ltd, 1964) In the given case, Record owned a farm that was managed by his agent Berry, who lived on that farm. Berry hired Wagner to bale the hay, as Records agent, and asked Wagner to bill it to Record. The transaction was complete. Later, the agency was terminated but Berry continued to stay on the land as a tenant. Wagner was again, hired by Berry to bale the hay and was again, asked to bill to Record. This time, Record refused to pay citing that the agency was terminated and Berry was not authorised by him for that act. Wagner Sues. Wagner has a right to claim damages from Record as nothing appeared to change and he had every reason to believe ta Berry was acting in his capacity as Records agent. Hence, Wagner has no fault and by the law of agency he is bound to claim the damages. According to the law of agency, if an agent acts on behalf of the principal in emergency situations where the principals approval cannot be obtained using reasonable means, he cannot be held liable for the acts done in pursuance of his powers as an agent of the principal (McMeel, 2000). This clearly indicates that an agent works on behalf of the principle and is not liable for the acts of the owner. The agent cannot be held liable. In the case, Ms Baumann accompanied her sick mother to the hospital where she signed a document that stated that she undertook the liability to pay for any expenses that couldnt be recovered through her mothers insurance. The expenses came to $19013.42. Baumann was asked to pay on the premise that she signed the document that it was a guarantee of payment. Baumann Refused The contention of Ms Baumann in this case, is correct. The hospital cannot compel Ms Baumann to pay for the expenses as she was merely acting in her capacity as her mothers agent, in the case of an emergency (Saintier, 2008). The ultimate liability is not hers. Hence, Ms baumann cannot be forced in this regard as she was not acting for herself. According to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, no employer can discriminate against a job applicant based on their race, religion, ethnicity or gender. However, if the employer has reasonable reasons to justify the discrimination, Title VII does not affect him. Reasonable reasons include a prior felony that puts the employer at high risk, given the nature of the job position applied for. The applicant is however, given an opportunity to explain the circumstances of the arrest.(Home : Laws, Regulations Guidance : Prohibited Practices) In this case, Alex Riley, a black man was refused the job of a photographer in continental photo, Inc, stating the reasons that, the company excluded all felony applicants and that, his questionable honesty would prove troublesome as he had to handle a lot of cash. Alex Riley contended that he was discriminated against and that, title VII had been violated. The contention of Alex Riley in this case, holds good. The company has violated title VII as its policy excludes all felony convictions. Its justification that, there will be a necessity to handle a lot of cash is not sound and cannot be accepted. According to EEOC, it wouldnt matter if he was convicted of murder. The case still would favour Alex Riley. According to partnership laws, the partners are acting one for all. The acts of any of the partners can be binding on the entire firm and all the partners. The partners are jointly and severally liable for the acts of one another and each. Further it is provided that, even if the parties are not in a formal arrangement that constitutes a partnership, if the arrangement is such as all the facts point to a partnership like association, it will be considered as such. (Deards, Key features of partnership and the 1980 Act) In the given case, Daniel Zuckerman and his mother, Elaine brought an action against Dr Joseph Antenucci and Dr Jose Pena. Although the summons didnt explicitly state the nature of their association, as it became apparent, eventually. They will be prosecuted in the court of law as a partnership. Even though, only one of the partners indulged in the malpractice, the liability will be jointly shared. Hence, the contention of Antenucci that he cant be held liable for his partners acts is not valid and the amount of the verdict, being $4 million, has to be borne by both the partners, jointly and severally. According to the laws relating to companies and their corporate personality, if the intention is to defraud the people associated with the company, then, the incorporation of the company can be said to be used as a corporate veil and in those cases, the individual benefitting wrongly from such veil and the company behind it shall be treated as one and the same for the purposes of fixing liability. The corporate veil is also known as corporate fiction (Beatson et.al, 2010) In the case given cases, Elkridge an employee and tenant of the building that the corporation acquired from Siebrecht by paying consideration of 10000 worth of stock, fell down a flight of stairs that was defective. She sues Siebrecht on the premise that he had used the corporation as a tool to escape personal liability. Elenkriegs contention does not hold good, in this case. Even though, there is the effect of escaping personal liability, there needs to be an intention to defraud by the incorporation of the company and hence, Siebrecht cant be held liable in this case. SEC has pursued the theory of misappropriation against Falcone. The theory of misappropriation holds good when, the person involved in the offense of insider trading is not a corporate person but is in a fiduciary relationship with the person who gave him the information in the first place. He had a duty to not disclose sensitive information to others, before it was made officially public (Peel Treitel, 2011) In this case, Gregory Savage, an employee of Hudson News faxed to his neighbour, a stockbroker named Larry Strath, prior to the close of the market on Thursday and prior to release to the public that evening, information obtained from the Business week magazine, of sensitive nature, being in a fiduciary position. Strath traded on the information and passed it on to Joseph Falcone, who traded on that information, so obtained. Although in this case, the information was tipped to Falcone, which was previously tipped to Strath by the Gregory Savage. He is in fiduciary position and if Falcone had no prior information about the breach of trust by the person tipping the information, he cannot be held liable. Three conditions must be fulfilled. One, Falcone must know the breach and two, the person, that is, Gregory savage must have, in fact, breached and three, Falcone must have traded on that information. ordinarily, accountants are not liable to third parties due to operation of privity of contract. However, in cases where the third party is known to eventually rely on the accountants work and there is gross negligence on part of the accountant while carrying out his work, such conditions constitute an exception to privity of contract and the accountant can be held liable for his acts (Sealy Hooley, 2009) In this case, the accountants contention that, he was not in privity of contract with him, does not hold good. Thayer, the manager of Montana Merchandising, Inc. , hired the services of Bloomgren, an accountant. Bloomgren was entrusted with the job of auditing the accounts of Intermountain merchandising, whose business Montana Inc was considering to purchase. Relying on the audit report of the accountant, which showed the business to be profitable, Thayer went ahead with the purchase. Later, when facts relating to the mistakes made in the audit by the accountant came into lights the business was, in fact, insolvent, the accountant was sued. A derivate suit is a result of escalating mistrust between the management and the shareholders. There is a very real possibility that the management, being in position of trust and enjoying the benefits of incorporation might mismanage corporations funds. A derivate suit lets the shareholders question such behaviour (Choper et. al, 2009). Dunaway negotiated a sale deed and a non-compete agreement in exchange of a car, all of which were corporate assets. He failed to disclose the facts of the case. It cannot be said that the defendant, Mr Dunaway has made sufficient disclosure as, an agreement that involved corporations assets should be intimated to all the concerned parties. The fact that the derivative action was brought against Dunaway by minority shareholders, is not of consequence. There can be said with certainty that Dunaway acted against his fiduciary duty to the corporation. He engaged in the sale agreement and devaluation of assets and also the non-compete agreement all by him and there was mismanagement of funds involved in the, and as a result of, the above transactions. His fiduciary duty to the corporation isnt done. References Beatson,J, Burrows A and Cartwright,J (2010) Anson's Law of Contract (29th edn OUP) Choper, JH, Coffee, JC and Gilson, R. J (2009). Cases and Materials on Corporations (7th ed. Aspen ) McMeel, G (2000) Philosophical Foundations of the Law of Agency (3rd ed. Oxford Press) Sealy, LS and Hooley, RJA (2009) Commercial Law: Text, Cases and Materials (4th edn OUP) Peel E, Treitel,GH (2011) Treitel on the Law of Contract (13th ed. Oxford press) Saintier,S (2008) Final guidelines on compensation of commercial agents (3th edn OUP) Wests Business Law Agency: Liability to Third Parties and Termination (9th Ed.)